Several bloggers have chosen to write about historical fiction lately. I'm not sure why -- perhaps it has to do with the promise of spring. In any event, I can't let the discussion pass without reviewing some of my rules for
writing historical fiction. They may not apply to all writers, but they guide
me in the choices I make and the kinds of research I do. Be true to the time period. Don’t
ever guess at the order in which events took place. Double-check dates and times
so that you don’t run a chance of turning a cause into an effect. There’s a
difference between saying that a man shot a dog because the dog attacked him,
or that the dog attacked the man who tried to shoot him. In the first instance,
we’re dealing with a vicious dog; in the second, the man may be the one who is
vicious. If your story is about people who
live in a particular time period, be sure you know the appropriate details of
dress, food availability, household furnishings, modes of transportation, and
social customs of the period. Also check details of local vegetation, climate,
and wildlife habitats. Don’t let your native of Oklahoma pull a salmon out of
the local river. If your story also involves actual
political or military events, your responsibilities multiply. Your descriptions
and discussions must reflect the facts as they were known at the time. Don’t let
hindsight lead you astray here. We now know that a pregnant woman who takes the
drug thalidomide runs a grave risk of birth defects in her unborn child, but
the doctors who prescribed the drug to cure morning sickness back in the 50s
did not. Don’t blame someone for lack of knowledge if that knowledge was
unavailable at the time. Be true to your story. Most
historians hate playing “what if” with history. No matter how many alternative
universes you may describe, it won’t change the one in which your events
actually took place. What if Germany had won World War II? Maybe Hitler would
have managed to turn the entire world population into blond, blue-eyed Aryans.
Maybe he would have turned out to be a really nice guy whose genetic
experiments resulted in the cure of cancer and other life-threatening diseases.
Or maybe he would have been hit by a bus, and we would have discovered that we
didn’t need to fight that war after all. Now we’re talking fantasy, not
history. And while fantasy may be amusing, it doesn’t increase anyone’s
understanding of anything. Don’t change the facts to suit your
story. Change your story to make it fit the facts. The people who read your
historical fiction may be people who know the period well. Or, if they don’t
know much about the history, they are probably hoping to learn something from
your story. It’s foolish to try to hoodwink readers of the first type, because
they will dismiss you as clueless. It’s unkind to mislead readers of the second
type, because you will be betraying their trust. Either way, you will lose
readers, not gain them. Most important, be true to your
character. If you are writing about a real person, you owe it to yourself and
to her to find out as much as possible about her. Don’t exaggerate her
education or experiences. Work with her own life to make her struggles more
understandable. Don’t rely solely on gossip or what others thought about the character.
Ask what she thought about herself. That’s why diaries and personal letters are
helpful when you are trying to flesh out a character. Judge the characters in your story
only as you could have judged them in person. You must not criticize someone who
made a well-considered decision simply because it turned out badly. You need to
look beneath the result to discover the intention. Don’t blame Lincoln for not
emancipating the slaves before you can judge his efforts. Before you judge a
slave-owner, you must at least try to understand why he needed to have slaves
in the first place. Only then can you start to examine his treatment of those
slaves. If you want to read more, these sections come from The Second Mouse Gets the Cheese, now available in a Kindle edition for only $2.99. |
