Being on a Library Shelf is Not a Guarantee of Accuracy
Welcome to Katzenhaus Books, where we tell - the stories behind the history.
RSS Follow Become a Fan

Delivered by FeedBurner


Recent Posts

My December
One More Before the Excitement Fades
Trumpets! Confetti! Funny Hats! Screaming Crowds!
Getting On with the Writing
Turning an Idea into a Business

Categories

A new contest
Abolition
absurdity
academic myopia
Almost Free
Amazon
ancestors
Announcement
apocalypse
Applications and software
Appomattox
Arnulf of Lisieux
art of speaking
attracting readers
audience
audio books
Author Central
Author Gifts
author's Plea
awards
baseball
basketball
Battle of Port Royal
Battles
biographical
blind artists
blockade
blog chain
Book Club Guides
Book Design
Book Launch
book stores
book trailer
bookstores
Boxed Set
bright ideas
Building a platform
business
Business plan
Busy-ness
butterflies
Career choices
cats
celebrations
cemetery research
Census
challenges
characterization
Characters
Charleston
children
children's books
choosing a publisher
Choosing a Title
Christmas
Christmas Past
Civil War
commercials
Computer Hacks
Confederates
Conferences
Connections
constitutional amendments
construction
Contract labor
cotton
Countdown Sale
Countdown to Launch
Cover Designs
Cover images
cutting and pasting
Cyber Monday
daily drama
daily events
Dead Mules
Deal of the Day
decisions
depression
diversions
dogs
Do-Overs
DRM
earthquake
e-book pricing
e-books
editing
elevator speech
elmore leonard
Elves and Holidays
Emancipation
England
English class
evidence
Excerpt
exclusivity
Exercise
Expertise
Facebook
fact and fiction
failures
fame and fortune
family affairs
Favorites
Fear of Failure
Fish
flood waters
flowers
food delights
Formatting
Fort Pulaski
free chapter
Free Days
freebies
Friendship
Frogmore
garden
gardens
genealogy
Getting organized
ghost stories
Giveaway
Goals
good business
good news
grammar cops
gratitude
gray horses
gripes
grocery shopping
guest blogs
Gullah
handicaps
Harriet Tubman
Hiatus
Historical background
Historical Fiction
historical puzzlers
historical thinking
history lessons
Holidays
home office
hope and kindness
horse races
horses
hurricanes
identifying your audience
illustrations
imagination
indie authors
Inspiration
inspirations
internet
internet history
intruders
ISBN
Kalamazoo
karma
Kindle
Kindle links
Kindle rankings
Kindle Serials
kings
Klout
Ku Klux Klan
Lack of co-ordination
landmarks
language
Laughs
launch dates
Laura Towne
Layouts
legal matters
lending library
Lessons learned
lessons unlearned
libraries
literary genres
local news
love story
making choices
Marketing
Matchbooks
medicine
medieval-isms
Meet the Characters
Memorial Day
memories
Milestones
military matters
mind-mapping
Misfis
Monthly Musings
name recognition
NaNoWriMo
Nellie Chase
New Blog
New Book
New England
New Research
New Year
newsletters
nonfiction
non-profits
nostalgia
Nurses
oddities
odds and ends
olympics
omens
opening lines
outrage
Oxford
Papacy
parties
Penn Center
photographs
picture book
Pinterest
Pinterest and copyrights
Pirates
planning ahead
plot
point of view
polite society
politics
portraits
powerful women
Predictions
pre-orders
press release
previews
pricing
Principles
procrastination
productivity
Profiles
Progress Report
Promotions
proofs
pros and cons
publishing
publishing companies
publishing ploys
publishing rights
pure sentimentality
puzzlements
quiz
rain
random thoughts
RBOC
read an ebook
readership
recipes
Reconstruction
Relaxation
research
Resolutions
reviews
road trip
rough draft
Roundhead Reports
royalties
rules
SALE
Sales
scams
schedules
Scoop It
ScoopIt
seasons
Secessionville
second edition
Second Mouse
self-publishing
settings
Shiloh
Short Stories
Silliness
slander
Slavery
small world
Smile of the Day
snow, living in the south
social media
software
software disasters
South Carolina
Speechless!
sports
Spring
story arc
Substitutes
Success
summer
Synopsis
Taking a Break
Taxes
Thank You
the difficulties of blogging
The Gideonites
Theme
Tongue-in-cheek
Traditions
trailer
Travelog
trilogies
trolls
Tweet
Twitter
Upcoming Events
using commas
Vacation
vacation photos
Valentine
video
Visitor
vocabulary
Volunteering
voting
warnings
weather
weather trauma
website
word counts
Word-of-Mouth
Words
Words of Warning
Writer Beware!
Writer's Block
Writing Advice
Writing as Career
writing process

Archives

December 2017
November 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010

powered by

"Roundheads and Ramblings"

Being on a Library Shelf is Not a Guarantee of Accuracy

OK.  I've struggled with this problem long enough.  It's time to make an informed guess and then act upon it.  You'll remember that I've been looking for the original diary written in South Carolina by Laura M. Towne during the Civil War. I haven't located the original.  What I HAVE found are four versions of that diary — each one different in content and in tone.  They might as well have been written by four different Lauras.  Which one should be my guide as I try to portray Laura in this new novel? 

Let's start by putting an end to the search.  I am convinced that the original diary no longer exists or has fallen between the cracks somewhere in a distant family member's attic.  Everyone I talked to seemed to "know" where it is — except that they were all wrong.  Even the highest level archivists admit that they cannot produce it.  My  own explanation?  I think it disappeared for the same reason there are four versions of it.  Laura's friends and family members had varying memories of her — memories they did not want to challenge by allowing the public to read Laura's most private thoughts. How do you keep her thoughts private?  By hiding them away where no one will ever find them. And somebody did a really good job!  

If I were still thinking like a historian, I might be tempted just to drop the whole thing right now.  A historian must be sure of her sources.  If the original is not available, the quest is over.  But as Dr. Paul Hyams reminded me here a couple of weeks ago,  saying 'There is no evidence' is a historian's excuse, not a defense for a novelist. A novelist must bring imagination to the mix, hoping to come up with the hidden solution.  So here goes. 

Source number 1 is a microfilmed copy of a typescript of the diary, very obviously produced on an electric typewriter and then carefully proofread and corrected with proofreader's marks.  I have no idea who typed this version, but I can date it to the 1960s or early 1970s, when electric typewriters were available to writers.  That makes this version a hundred years younger than the original. And for that reason alone it is unlikely to be the closest match to the original.  In a hundred years, too many other individuals have had a chance to make changes.  Out it goes.  

Source number 2 is also a typescript contained on the same roll of microfilm from the University of North Carolina's Southern History Collection.  This one differs in several ways.  It was typed on an old manual typewriter, evidenced by the slightly misaligned letters, the standard evenly-spaced font, and the tendency of some circular letters to be shaded because the typewriter keys have collected ink in their depressions. It is also identified as having been prepared from the original by Dr. Horace Jenks for the information of the Board of Trustees of the Penn School. The approximate date of preparation was 1908, just after the death of Laura's long-time partner, Ellen Murray.  

This one called for more investigation.  First, who was Horace H. Jenks? He was the son of Helen Carnan Towne, who was the daughter of John Henry Towne, Laura Towne's older brother — which makes him Laura's great-nephew. His mother had inherited Laura's estate in 1901.  By  the time of Ellen Murray's death, Horace and his older brother Robert were taking over trusteeship duties at the Penn School from their mother.  It is safe to assume that both Horace and Robert Jenks had seen Laura's diary; when Horace authorized a typescript, he was working from the original. 

But that's not the end of the story, because this typescript has its own problems.  It is incomplete.  There are gaps in the dating, sometimes for several weeks and sometimes as much as three months. Furthermore, Horace was a Harvard-educated academic, who dutifully used the required ellipses whenever he omitted sections of the diary.  The typescript is riddled with those little series of dots.  . . . .  I'm grateful he at least marked them, but omissions simply raise more questions.  

Did he just leave out the boring parts?  No, the omitted sections often occur at times when diaries and letters from other Gideonites reveal internal disagreements, disputes with the army, massive epidemics of killer diseases, or unusual danger from the threats of war.  The result is a fairly  happy picture of a woman who is doing the job she was sent to do, teaching slaves, treating minor ailments, and learning how to live in a surprisingly hospitable new land.  It's a lovely picture, but obviously inaccurate.  That's the trouble with ellipses.  

One other characteristic of Source Number 2 bothers me. In it, Laura frequently expresses her displeasure with — and sometimes outright disgust for — the freedmen of South Carolina. She comments on how dirty they are, how uncivilized, how slow to learn, how uncooperative, how rude, how lacking in ordinary common sense, how superstitious,  how cruel in their treatment of animals. Her attitude in the early sections of the diary does not in any way reflect her abolitionist belief that the Negro was as capable as any white person.  In later sections, the complaints diminish, but favorable judgments are still hard to find. So why would Horace leave such derogatory comments in the typescript?  

Maybe he was just being honest.  Maybe Laura Towne was a bigot.  No, there's a more plausible explanation.  As early as 1900, Horace Jenks was leading a movement to change the very nature of the Penn School. When Laura founded the school, she wanted it to offer a standard "English" education, so that the children of freedmen would grow up with the same educational advantages as their white neighbors.  For almost forty years, she taught academic subjects — sometimes offering Latin, advanced algebra, philosophy, and ancient history.  Horace Jenks and several other trustees favored turning the Penn School into a vocational center.  They had begun dropping the academics and substituting classes in shoemaking, blacksmithing, basket-weaving (really!), sewing, and agriculture. The change reflects the racial biases of the early 20th century, of course, but the edited transcript of Laura Towne's diary gives the erroneous impression that Laura shared those views.  Why did it not appear until 1908?  I suspect it was because Ellen Murry was no longer around to oppose it. 

This typescript has its value, but only for the sake of what it reveals about the editor, not about the original writer.  I may use it for comparative fact-checking, but it's not a reliable guide to Laura.  There are still two other sources — a printed edition of the diary and letters and an elusive handwritten copy.  We'll look at those tomorrow.